Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2012/08/suffolk-laws-pro-bono-program/
Monday, September 30, 2013
Suffolk Law's Pro Bono Program
The Importance of Civility in the Courtroom
• The Honorable James Holderman: The Chief Judge of the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Illinois joined the court in 1985 after he was nominated by President Ronald Reagan. He became Chief Judge in 2006. Holderman is also chair of the ABA’s Commission on the American Jury Project, which focuses on the implementation of the ABA Principles on Juries and Jury Trials into the courtroom and reaching out to the public about the importance of jury service and jury reform. • Dick A. Semerdjian: Attorney Semerdjian is chair of the ABA Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section (TIPS). TIPS is the knowledge and leadership hub for trial practice and issues of justice that involve tort insurance and law. • MaryGrace Schaeffer: As vice president of DecisonQuest, Schaeffer has been a trial consultant for more than 22 years. Her expertise includes strategy and theme development, mock trials, witness evaluation and preparation, shadow juries, post-trial interviews and more. Listen to their thoughts on why legal professionals need to be cognizant of civility in the courtroom, the strategies they use to implement it, changes they’d like to see in the legal world regarding civility, and more.
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/aba-tips/2013/04/the-importance-of-civility-in-the-courtroom
legal aid legal aid eugene oregon legal aid society legal counsel legal help
Supreme Court Watch: Employment law cases
We will be watching three pending cases at the US Supreme Court as the Court's session opens today:
Kloeckner v. Solis
Oral argument on October 2.
The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) hears appeals by federal employees regarding certain adverse actions, such as dismissals. If the employee asserts that the challenged action was the result of unlawful discrimination, that claim is referred to as a "mixed case."
Question Presented: If the MSPB decides a mixed case without determining the merits of the discrimination claim, is the court with jurisdiction over that claim the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or a district court?
Vance v. Ball State Univ
Oral argument on November 26.
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998) held that under Title VII, an employer is vicariously liable for workplace harassment by a supervisor of the victim. If the harasser was the victim’s co-employee, however, the employer is not liable absent proof of negligence.
Question Presented: Whether the Faragher and Ellerth “supervisor” liability rule (i) applies to harassment by those whom the employer vests with authority to direct and oversee their victim’s daily work, or (ii) is limited to those harassers who have the power to “hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or discipline” their victim.
Genesis HealthCare v. Symczyk
Oral argument December 3.
Symczk sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated. This was a section 216(b) collective action. The defendants extended an offer of judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 in full satisfaction of her alleged damages, fees, and costs - prior to her moving for conditional certification and prior to other potential plaintiffs opting in.
Question Presented: Whether a case becomes moot, and thus beyond the judicial power of Article III, when the lone plaintiff receives an offer from the defendants to satisfy all of the plaintiff's claims.
Source: http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2012/10/supreme_court_w_11.html
Vaccine Refusals Fueled California's Whooping Cough Epidemic
The whooping cough vaccine isn't perfect, but public health officials suspected that something else contributed to the 2010 pertussis outbreak in California. A study finds that neighborhoods where more parents filed for vaccination exemptions for their children had higher rates of infection.
» E-Mail This » Add to Del.icio.us
lawyer fees lawyer firm lawyer malpractice attorneys lawyer office lawyers
US Senators propose overhaul of surveillance laws
Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/09/senators-propose-overhaul-of-us-surveillance-laws.php
LawBiz® Legal Pad: Charging for the Initial Consultation
Source: http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/LawBizBlog/~3/0U4FID2_ICs/
lawyer fees lawyer firm lawyer malpractice attorneys lawyer office lawyers
Michigan Treasury Department rules same-sex spouses must file separate tax returns
Wisconsin public employee collective bargaining statute amendments declared unconstitutional
A teachers' union sought declarative and injunctive relief against the governor, claiming that statutory amendments dealing with municipal employees' collective bargaining rights and payroll deductions of dues and pension contributions were unconstitutional.
The trial court declared the statute unconstitutional. Madison Teachers v. Walker (Wisconsin Circuit Ct 09/14/2012)
(1) Certain portions of the statute violated the free speech clauses of the Wisconsin and US constitutions. Although there is no constitutional right to collective bargaining, the statute imposes burdens on the speech and associational rights of employees represented by unions which burdens are not imposed on other employees. They cannot negotiate wage increases greater than the cost of living, they cannot pay dues by payroll deductions solely because the dues go to labor organizations. A ban on fair share agreements means that union members bear the cost of bargaining for non-members who receive the befits of bargaining. Requiring unions to be recertified annually burdens members with the full costs of the election.
(2) The trial court applied strict scrutiny to the equal protection claims because of the infringement on speech rights. The statute creates two classes of employees (represented and non-represented), and the defendants "offer no defense of the statute that would survive strict scrutiny."
(3) Certain portions of the statute violated the Wisconsin constitution's home rule amendment, violated the constitutional bar on impairment of contracts, and deprived employees of property without due process.
Source: http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2012/09/wisconsin_publi.html
patent lawyer personal injury personal injury attorney personal injury attorneys personal injury lawyer
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Taking Advantage of Apps and Plug-ins
Bench opening in Ramsey County
The Commission on Judicial Selection is now accepting applications for the seat on the Ramsey County District Court bench recently vacated by Judge Kathleen Gearin. The seat is chambered in St. Paul.
The commission considers integrity, maturity, health (if job related), judicial temperament, legal knowledge, ability, experience and community service.
Applications are available from Lee E. Sheehy, Chair of the Commission on Judicial Selection, at 130 State Capitol, 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, St. Paul, MN 55155, or by contacting Andrew Olson, Appointments Coordinator, via e-mail at andrew.c.olson@state.mn.us. A cover letter and resume should also be submitted with the application. Application materials are due by close of business, Monday, Sept. 30, 2013. Interviews are scheduled to be held on Friday, Oct. 18, 2013, in St. Paul, Minnesota.
For inquiries concerning the application process, please contact Andrew Olson at andrew.c.olson@state.mn.us or at (651) 201-3413.
Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2013/09/09/bench-opening-in-ramsey-county/
find a lawyer find an attorney find attorney find lawyer free attorney consultation
New American Bar Association President James Silkenat Outlines His 2013-2014 Agenda
James Silkenat has been working in international law for more than forty years. He joined the ABA’s first delegation to China in the mid-1970s and since then has chaired the International Law Section. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and of the American Law Institute, and has served as a Fellow in the U.S. State Department Scholar/Diplomat Program. As well as numerous other positions in and outside of the ABA, he will now serve as the president of the nation’s largest legal organization.
Silkenat will discuss his major platform goals for his presidency, including the legal education financing system and student debt, a legal job corps, the ABA’s stance on gun violence, and more.
Special thanks to our sponsor, Clio.
Justice Department Pushes New Thinking On Kids And Crime
"We believe firmly that children should be kept in school and out of courts," says Justice Department official Robert Listenbee. In his new role leading the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, he's trying to help stop what experts describe as a "school-to-prison pipeline."
» E-Mail This » Add to Del.icio.us
letter of attorney litigation attorney local attorney local lawyer local solicitors
8th District judges appointed
Jennifer K. Fischer and Rodney C. Hanson have been appointed as District Court Judges in Minnesota’s Eighth Judicial District. Fischer will replace the Honorable Kathryn N. Smith and Mr. Hanson will replacethe Honorable Jon Stafsholt, who both retired earlier this year. . Fischer will be chambered at Willmar in Kandiyohi County while Hanson will be chambered at Glenwood in Pope County.
Fischer is the Kandiyohi County Attorney, where she prosecutes crimes and serves as the legal advisor to the County Board of Commissioners. She previously was a partner at Jones & Fischer, P.A., and, prior to that, served as an assistant public defender for the Eighth Judicial District. Fischer earned her B.S. from St. Cloud State University and her J.D. with honors from the William Mitchell College of Law.
Hanson is a partner with Anderson, Larson, Hanson & Saunders P.L.L.P., where he practices primarily in civil litigation. He has maintained a local practice in Willmar since 1985 and is a qualified neutral and arbitrator for the American Arbitration Association. Hanson earned his B.A. with honors from Concordia College and his J.D. from the William Mitchell College of Law.
Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2013/09/10/8th-district-judges-appointed/
Passing the Tech Skills Competency Audit
attorney at law attorney definition attorney directory attorney fees attorney finder
Booting Up: New NSA Data Farm Takes Root In Utah
Even as it continues to grapple with concerns about its data-gathering operations, the National Security Agency is poised to open a massive facility where cellphone, text message, email and landline data can be stored and analyzed.
Washington's sexual orientation discrimination amendment is not retroactive
The Washington State Supreme Court held today that a sexual orientation discrimination amendment adopted in 2006 is not retroactive.
The court also concluded that conduct that took place prior to the amendment is admissible background evidence to prove the discriminatory nature of certain conduct occurring after the amendment.
Loeffelholz v. Univ of Washington (Washington 09/13/2012)
Loeffelholz sued under the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD) claiming discrimination based on sexual orientation. WLAD was amended in 2006 to include sexual orientation as a protected class, and Loeffelholz alleged several pre-amendment acts and one post-amendment act.
The Washington Supreme Court held that (1) the WLAD amendment is not retroactive and the pre-amendment conduct is not actionable as it was not unlawful when it occurred, and (2) the post-amendment allegedly discriminatory comment is arguably similar enough to the pre-amendment conduct to survive summary judgment.
Loeffelholz alleged that her supervisor between 2003 and June 2006 maintained a hostile work environment based on sexual orientation. This was prior to the WLAD amendment. Loeffelholz also alleged a single act of discrimination by this supervisor after the WLAD amendment.
The court's findings:
(1) Pre-amendment conduct is not actionable. Retroactive application of the amendment would violate the employer's due process rights. The plain language of the amendment and its legislative history indicate only prospective application.
(2) Pre-amendment conduct is admissible as background evidence to prove why the post-amendment conduct is discriminatory.
(3) The post-amendment conduct was a single statement by Loeffelholz's supervisor, who was about to be deployed to Iraq, that he was "going to come back a very angry man." The court found that a reasonable jury could infer that this comment was a natural extension of pre-amendment conduct - the supervisor's dislike of lesbians and his anger management problems as illustrated by his comments that he had a volatile temper and kept a gun. This is enough to preclude summary judgment.
Source: http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2012/09/washingtons_sex.html
find attorney find lawyer free attorney consultation free lawyer free lawyer advice
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Experience User-Friendly Systems
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/tech-experts/2012/10/experience-user-friendly-systems/
This Law Wants To Save Teens' Reputations, But Probably Won't
By 2015, Facebook and other social networking sites will have to allow California minors to delete embarrassing posts. But the law is riddled with loopholes, and teens won't be protected any more than they already are.
» E-Mail This » Add to Del.icio.us
lawyer directory lawyer fees lawyer firm lawyer malpractice attorneys lawyer office
Nourishing Creativity with Constraints
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/2013/04/nourishing-creativity-with-constraints
Fake Reviewers Get Zero Stars From New York Attorney General
Nineteen companies agreed to pay more than $350,000 in penalties to settle accusations that they wrote or bought phony online reviews of their products, services or restaurants.
» E-Mail This » Add to Del.icio.us
family law family lawyer federal attorney financial lawyer find a lawyer
Post DOMA and Prop 8 Rulings: The Next Move for Gay Rights
• Harvard Law Professor Mark Tushnet specializes in constitutional law and theory, with a focus in examining the practice of judicial review in the U.S. and worldwide. He has served as a law clerk to Justice Thurgood Marshall. Currently, his focus is in constitutional history and the development of civil liberties. He is known for his critical and controversial analysis of Supreme Court rulings, including Brown v. The Board of Education and Roe v. Wade.
• William Eskridge, Yale Law Professor, focuses in statutory interpretation. He represented a same-sex-married couple from 1990-1995 who sued for recognition of their marriage and has published many books covering the political framework of gay rights. The historical component of his book GayLaw was the basis of an amicus brief he drafted for the Cato Institute and for much of the Court’s (and dissenting opinion’s) analysis in Lawrence vs. Texas, the decision which made same-sex sexual activity legal in every U.S. state.
These law professors will provide unique insight to the future of gay rights through their knowledge and experience with Supreme Court rulings and civil liberties movements.
Thanks to our sponsor, Clio.
Turn Your Solo Practice into a Highly Utilized Business
lemon law letter of attorney litigation attorney local attorney local lawyer
Here Comes the Next Round of E-Discovery Rules
Mark Michels is a director at Deloitte Financial Advisory Services. As a former in-house counsel, he specializes in advising on electronic discovery management. Mark has more than 13 years of experience in devising multi-faceted corporate discovery programs, including developing discovery compliance processes and requirements, evaluating and implementing solutions for collection, processing, review, and production of diverse corporate data, and applying continuous process improvement methodologies.
Henry Kelston is senior counsel at Milberg, specializing in complex litigation and electronic discovery. Henry is a member of the firm's e-discovery practice group and The Sedona Conference's Working Group 1 on Electronic Document Retention and Production. He is a frequent writer and speaker on e-discovery issues.
Listen in on the roundtable discussion of the future of e-discovery.
Friday, September 27, 2013
IRS Official At Center Of Political Scandal Will Retire
Lois Lerner, who admitted that her division had inappropriately singled out Tea Party and patriot groups requesting tax exemption, had been on paid leave since May.
Transvaginal Mesh Complications and Litigation
lawyer colleges lawyer directory lawyer fees lawyer firm lawyer malpractice attorneys
Key changes to Patent Law
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/09/key-changes-to-patent-law/
Comment sought on unauthorized practice opinions
The Virginia State Bar’s standing committee on unauthorized practice of law is seeking public comments by Sept. 9 on two proposed UPL opinions.
One opinion addresses a situation highlighted by a case this year in the Amherst County courts. A juvenile and domestic relations judge allowed a husband involved in a custody case to serve as prosecutor when the wife was charged with criminal contempt for disobeying a visitation order.
Lynchburg lawyer M. Paul Valois – the one-time lawyer for the wife – objected to the litigant serving as a state lawyer, but neither the J&DR judge nor a circuit judge were persuaded to change the arrangement.
Now, the VSB panel proposes UPL Opinion 217 stating that it is the unauthorized practice of law for a non-lawyer party in a civil domestic relations matter to act as prosecutor for criminal contempt proceedings arising from the case.
The proposed opinion will be considered in October by the VSB Council, according to the VSB.
Another proposed UPL opinion would state that a state probation officer is not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in making a sentencing recommendation or giving an opinion about the appropriate outcome of a criminal matter in a pre-sentence report.
The VSB committee found a “range of legal authority” indicating a probation officer was not straying into legal practice while performing statutory duties to bring issues to the attention of a court.
Written comments about the proposed UPL opinions can be sent to VSB executive director Karen Gould.
Source: http://valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2013/08/28/comment-sought-on-unauthorized-practice-opinions/
traffic attorney traffic lawyer traffic ticket lawyer absolute power of attorney attorney
The Metrics Behind Predictive Coding
Eric Robinson has more than 20 years of accumulated legal, e-Discovery and project management experience. As a Solution Architect at Kroll Ontrack, Eric works collaboratively and consultatively with clients to develop and implement strategic cost-effective, efficient and defensible discovery strategies. Leveraging his knowledge of current legal trends, regulatory matters, and information management technologies for litigation, Eric recommends defensible processes, procedures and technology solutions to optimize client efficiencies and develop best practices.
The first step to implementing predictive coding into your e-discovery review process is understanding key terms like Confidence Level, Precision, Recall, and Accuracy. And don’t worry, the intent with predictive coding is to have the mathematical values automatically computed by the document review software, no calculator required!
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/esi-report/2013/05/the-metrics-behind-predictive-coding
ITC judge issues preliminary ruling against HTC in Nokia patent dispute
Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/09/itc-judge-issues-preliminary-ruling.php
free lawyer free lawyer advice free lawyer consultation free lawyer consultation california free lawyers
Summary of Knox v. SEIU
My summary of Knox v. SEIU at SCOTUSblog.com: Knox knocks unions on mid-year assessment for non-members.
Source: http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2012/06/summary_of_knox.html
Getting to Yes: Advice for Legal Entrepreneurs from a Venture Capitalist
He explains how these dynamics combine to create opportunities for legal technology lawyers and vendors, and financiers, and how collaborations can result in companies like Lex Machina. They are creating technology products that ultimately help not just the legal community (lawyers, government, academia, and business) do better, faster, and cheaper work, but benefit consumers and businesses, as well. And for innovators and entrepreneurs, he offers concrete advice about how to best approach venture capitalists to successfully get them to yes.
attorney lawyer attorneys bankruptcy attorney bankruptcy lawyer bankruptcy lawyers
Thursday, September 26, 2013
IRS Dispute With Tax Preparers Is Horse of a Different Color
find attorney find lawyer free attorney consultation free lawyer free lawyer advice
France ex-president Sarkozy to be investigated for campaign funds fraud
free lawyers free legal advice free legal aid getting power of attorney government lawyer
Straight From The Hole
Before you dismiss Rideau as a killer who deserved whatever he got, bear in mind that stories from the inside aren't told by saints. Every once in a while, a former inmate emerges with the erudition necessary to put into words the world that most of us never knew existed. When this happens, it's a window through which we need to look. Rideau offers a view of solitary confinement, the hole.
I know something about solitary confinement, because I’ve been there. I spent a total of 12 years in various solitary confinement cells. And I can tell you that isolating a human being for years in a barren cell the size of a small bathroom is the cruelest thing you can do to a person.Deprived of all human contact, you lose your feeling of connectedness to the world. You lose your ability to make small talk, even with the guard who shoves your meal through the slot in the door. You live entirely in your head, for there is nothing else. You talk to yourself, answer yourself. You become paranoid, depressed, sleepless. To ward off madness, you must give your mind something to do. In 1970, I counted the 358 rivets that held my steel cell together, over and over. Every time the walls seemed to be closing in on me, I counted them again, to give my mind something to fasten on to.
Without having been there, it's likely inconceivable to understand what happens to a mind in isolation. Some of us have trouble being alone for an hour, an evening, a day. Add day upon day, year upon year. But not the way it is for us, where we still have access to television or internet, even if there is no other living person around. No, this is completely different.
But to add insult to injury, don't leap to the assumption that if a prisoner ends up in the hole, he must have done something pretty bad to deserve it.
In a world where authorities exercise absolute power and demand abject obedience, prisoners are almost always going to be on the losing side, and they know it.
The typical inmate doesn’t want trouble. He has little to gain and too much to lose: his job, his visits, his recreation time, his phone privileges, his right to buy tuna, ramen and stale bread at inflated prices in the commissary. The ways even a bystander to the most peaceful protest can be punished are limited only by the imagination of the authorities.
Punishment can be deserved or not. There's no due process in prison. There's no one to complain to about being punished based on a false accusation, a trumped up allegation, a guard pissed off by an attitude. Authorities own the lives of prisoners, and can be as harsh as they want to be, as arbitrary as they feel like. And there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
Rideau explains that the prison protests in California are an outgrowth of a system run amok and no other means of addressing their grievance.
And yet, sometimes things get so bad that prisoners feel compelled to protest, with work stoppages, riots or hunger strikes. On July 8, some 30,000 inmates in the custody of the California Department of Corrections went on a hunger strike to demand improvements in prison conditions. Their biggest complaint was the runaway use of solitary confinement, the fact that thousands of prisoners are consigned to this cruelty indefinitely, some for decades.
While prisoners are sentenced to incarceration, no judge sentences them to isolation for decades. There is no requirement that any neutral party review the decision to inflict this torture on another human being. It can be imposed for a sound reason or no reason at all. Who is to disagree? But no matter what the reason or nonreason, to put a person in the hole for years, for decades, is to impose psychological torture of a terrible kind on a human being. And there is nothing, absolutely nothing, the prisoner can do about it.
In California, inmates did the only thing left for them to do, protest. Not too many of us care about what happened to "criminals." After all, bad dudes who did bad things to other people. A pox on them. They get what they deserve and their out of sight, out of mind. But there is good reason to give them just a little bit of though. For one thing, they are still people, and we are still purportedly a civilized society that doesn't condone the needless brutal treatment of people. But if you lack anything remotely resembling empathy, than do it for your own sake:
Why should you be concerned about the inhumane conditions of prolonged solitary confinement, with all the social, emotional and mental deterioration that it entails? Well, every year men from California’s Pelican Bay and other supermax prisons around the nation are released directly from the vacuum of their cells into free society, to live and work among you and your loved ones. As a matter of self-preservation, maybe we should all join the prisoners’ request for rehabilitative opportunities that will improve the mental health of those in solitary.
Go say "hi" to the guy who moved in down the block kids. So what if he spent the last two decades in the hole and seems a bit odd. I'm sure he'll get over it.
© 2007-13 Simple Justice NY LLC. This feed is for personal, non-commercial & Newstex use only. The use of this feed on any other website is a copyright violation. If this feed is not via RSS reader or Newstex, it infringes the copyright.
Source: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2013/07/17/straight-from-the-hole.aspx?ref=rss
Nourishing Creativity with Constraints
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/2013/04/nourishing-creativity-with-constraints
green card lawyer immigration attorney immigration law immigration lawyer immigration lawyers
Sacramento’s New One-Day Divorce Program
Judge Mize began his career with an undergraduate degree in psychology, followed by graduate work at the School of Social Welfare where he earned his Master of Social Work. He found his work in social issues to be a defining part of his 26 years working as an attorney, and his current work on the bench. He has served as the presiding judge of the Sacramento Superior Court and is currently the supervising judge of Sacramento’s Family Court. Judge Mize is best known for his civil reform efforts which have garnered him several honors including the California Judge Association’s Alba Witkin Humanitarian Award and Sacramento County Bar Association’s Judge of the Year Award.
Tune into to hear about the inner workings of the new one-day divorce program, who qualifies, how it’s run, and more.
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2013/06/sacramentos-new-one-day-divorce-program
LAW SCHOOLS REPORT: Law Schools Get Down to Business
Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202620079000&rss=rss_nlj
criminal defense criminal defense attorney criminal defense attorneys criminal defense lawyer criminal injury lawyers
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
2013 Legal-Tech Surveys Say . . .
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report/2013/09/2013-legal-tech-surveys-say
Desktop as a Service for Lawyers
Rowe is a 4th generation attorney with an undergraduate degree in computer science and business administration. He now works as a technology consultant for law firms and businesses at OTB-Consulting and was named Technolawyer’s technology consultant of the year.
Rowe answers questions about DaaS for big, small, and solo firms, how to make DaaS secure, how to make it cost effective, and more. He will also talk about SaaS, software as a service, as it relates to lawyers and DaaS users.
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/legal-toolkit/2013/04/desktop-as-a-service-for-lawyers
lawyer firm lawyer malpractice attorneys lawyer office lawyers legal
Pussy Riot member launches hunger strike to protest prison conditions
What’s Next for RSS Feeds and News Readers?
Thanks to our sponsor, Transporter.
private lawyer pro bono lawyers probate attorney real estate attorney real estate lawyer
LawBiz® Legal Pad: The Best Laid Plans: Why Every Law Firm Needs Them, Part 1
Ed discusses why a law firm needs a business plan.
Source: http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/LawBizBlog/~3/TBnF2NgGiUY/
Finalists for bench named for 10th District
The Commission on Judicial Selection has recommended four candidates to Gov. Mark Dayton to fill two judicial vacancies in the 10th Judicial District. The finalists are Suzanne Bollman, Amy Brosnahan, Bridgid Dowdal and Mark Schroeder.
The vacancies were created by the retirements of Judge P. Hunter Anderson and Judge Elizabeth Martin. Anderson’s seat will be chambered in Cambridge in Isanti County and Martin’s in Center City in Chisago County.
Bollman currently serves as an Assistant Sherburne County Attorney. Previously, she was an Assistant Stearns County Attorney, an Assistant Benton County Attorney and an Assistant City Attorney for the City of Saint Cloud. Bollman was a member of the Supreme Court’s Gender Fairness Implementation Committee and is a union negotiator and steward for AFSCME.
Brosnahan currently serves as the Kanabec County Attorney. Previously, Brosnahan was the Assistant Kanabec County Attorney and, prior to that, was an attorney at the law firm of Leonard, Street & Deinard, where she practiced intellectual property, products liability and construction litigation. Additionally, Brosnahan was a founding member of the Methamphetamine Task Force/Substance Abuse Coalition of Kanabec County.
Dowdal is the chief legal counsel for the Office of Inspector General at the Minnesota Department of Human Services. She previously served as Assistant Dean at the William Mitchell College of Law, as partner at the law firm of Dowdal & Dowdal, PLC, as an Assistant United States Attorney and as a trial attorney at the United States Department of Justice. Dowdal has been a member of the Minnesota Supreme Court Historical Society and the Minnesota Women Lawyers Leadership Award Selection Committee.
Schroeder is a shareholder at Briggs and Morgan, P.A., where his practice focuses primarily on civil litigation, including breach of contract, fraud, trade regulation, and consumer finance litigation. Prior to joining Briggs and Morgan in 1985, Schroeder was a law clerk to United States District Court Judge Donald D. Alsop. He is a qualified neutral.
Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2013/09/20/finalists-for-bench-named-for-10th-district/
criminal law criminal law cases criminal laws criminal lawyer criminal lawyers
Police visit on ‘whim’ did not taint pot evidence
Does a “country boy” – with a home back in the woods behind a bunch of “no trespassing” signs – enjoy more privacy rights than a city dweller?
Maybe so, but police can still come knocking – even on the back door, says U.S. District Judge Jackson L. Kiser as he allows 182 marijuana plants into evidence against a Patrick County man.
Kiser denied David Jones’ suppression motion in the marijuana possession case of U.S. v. Jones.
Two years ago, police were destroying a crop of 19 pot plants in a Patrick County field when the officers decided “on a whim” to see if someone at the nearest house might have seen anyone hanging out in the area.
The house wasn’t visible from the road, but officers walked up the driveway, passing various signs reading, “No Trespassing,” “Posted: Private Property,” “Keep Out,” and the like. Short of a gate or fence around the property, “I am hard-pressed to think of a home more unwelcome to passers-by,” Kiser said.
While one officer knocked at the front door, another went around back.
The backyard was a veritable pot plantation, as Kiser described it. There were marijuana plants close to the house, in the yard and along trails through woods leading down to a creek.
While the officers waited for a search warrant, Jones arrived home, according to Kiser’s summary. He admitted the plants were his.
Even though Jones had a right to expect privacy in his backyard, Kiser said the officers acted reasonably in knocking on the front and back doors under the “knock-and-talk rule” articulated by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The back yard might normally be off limits, but police noticed a “well-worn path” around the side of the house and they knew the custom in the county was for many residents to use the back door of a house for entry and exit. The decision to follow the path was reasonable under the circumstances, Kiser said.
Source: http://valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2013/08/30/police-visit-on-whim-did-not-taint-pot-evidence/
Strategies for Building Your Law Practice: You’ve Started Up, Now What?
Erik Mazzone is the Director of the Center for Practice Management for the North Carolina Bar Association, where he advises lawyers on technology and practice management. He is a columnist for North Carolina Lawyer Magazine and ABA Law Practice Magazine, as well as a former columnist for TechnoLawyer. He is a graduate of Boston College and Boston College Law School.
Hear more on how to maintain and strengthen your practice, and hear specifics on budgeting, website creation and management, online marketing, and more.
free attorney consultation free lawyer free lawyer advice free lawyer consultation free lawyer consultation california
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Fake Reviewers Get Zero Stars From New York Attorney General
Nineteen companies agreed to pay more than $350,000 in penalties to settle accusations that they wrote or bought phony online reviews of their products, services or restaurants.
Women Who Opt Out: The Debate over Working Mothers and Work-Family Balance
legal news legal services lemon law letter of attorney litigation attorney
The Legal Trade Show Survival Guide
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/legal-toolkit/2012/07/the-legal-trade-show-survival-guide/
Secure Your Legal Data in the Cloud
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/tech-experts/2012/07/secure-your-legal-data-in-the-cloud/
lawyer lawyer colleges lawyer directory lawyer fees lawyer firm
LAW SCHOOLS REPORT: Law Schools Get Down to Business
Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202620079000&rss=rss_nlj
Magnuson joins Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi
Eric Magnuson has left Briggs and Morgan to join Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, which is expanding its appellate practice. The move is effective Sept. 2.
In an interview with Minnesota Lawyer, Magnuson, 62, indicated he was looking for a new challenge.
“Robins presents a real opportunity for me to do some national work in significant cases.” Magnuson said.
Magnuson, a former chief justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, joined Briggs and Morgan in 2007after the closure of Rider Bennett, where he had practiced since the late 1970s. Magnuson left Briggs after Gov. Tim Pawlenty appointed him to the Supreme Court in 2008; he rejoined that firm after stepping down from the court in 2010.
Later this week, Minnesota Lawyer will post a transcript of the interview with Magnuson, who was joined by Steven Schumeister, managing partner at Robins and Martin Lueck, the firm’s chair of the executive board.
Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2013/09/03/magnuson-joins-robins-kaplan-miller-ciresi/
power attorney power of attorney power of attorny private attorney private lawyer
Find Now, Read Later
Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report/2012/07/find-now-read-later/
Police visit on ‘whim’ did not taint pot evidence
Does a “country boy” – with a home back in the woods behind a bunch of “no trespassing” signs – enjoy more privacy rights than a city dweller?
Maybe so, but police can still come knocking – even on the back door, says U.S. District Judge Jackson L. Kiser as he allows 182 marijuana plants into evidence against a Patrick County man.
Kiser denied David Jones’ suppression motion in the marijuana possession case of U.S. v. Jones.
Two years ago, police were destroying a crop of 19 pot plants in a Patrick County field when the officers decided “on a whim” to see if someone at the nearest house might have seen anyone hanging out in the area.
The house wasn’t visible from the road, but officers walked up the driveway, passing various signs reading, “No Trespassing,” “Posted: Private Property,” “Keep Out,” and the like. Short of a gate or fence around the property, “I am hard-pressed to think of a home more unwelcome to passers-by,” Kiser said.
While one officer knocked at the front door, another went around back.
The backyard was a veritable pot plantation, as Kiser described it. There were marijuana plants close to the house, in the yard and along trails through woods leading down to a creek.
While the officers waited for a search warrant, Jones arrived home, according to Kiser’s summary. He admitted the plants were his.
Even though Jones had a right to expect privacy in his backyard, Kiser said the officers acted reasonably in knocking on the front and back doors under the “knock-and-talk rule” articulated by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The back yard might normally be off limits, but police noticed a “well-worn path” around the side of the house and they knew the custom in the county was for many residents to use the back door of a house for entry and exit. The decision to follow the path was reasonable under the circumstances, Kiser said.
Source: http://valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2013/08/30/police-visit-on-whim-did-not-taint-pot-evidence/
free lawyer consultation free lawyer consultation california free lawyers free legal advice free legal aid
Monday, September 23, 2013
Summary of Knox v. SEIU
My summary of Knox v. SEIU at SCOTUSblog.com: Knox knocks unions on mid-year assessment for non-members.
Source: http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2012/06/summary_of_knox.html
Legal-Tech Announcement Kick-off: Smart Phones, Smart Watches, Tablets, and more.
free attorney consultation free lawyer free lawyer advice free lawyer consultation free lawyer consultation california