Thursday, November 8, 2012

Update on Timeline for SEC Rulemaking to Implement the JOBS Act and Dodd-Frank Act

In recent weeks, the SEC has given notice of matters that SEC Commissioners will consider at an open meeting on August 22, 2012, including:

  • general solicitation rulemaking required by Title II of the JOBS Act
  • disclosure and reporting rules for conflict minerals and resource extraction issuers that are required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro also recently testified before a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee about the SEC’s progress in implementing rules and providing studies and reports to Congress required under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act.

The JOBS Act (http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/capital-markets-president-obama-signs-jobs-act-landmark-reform-for-small-and-emerging-growth-companies-now-law.html), among other things, eases some of the regulatory burden for small businesses and startups to generate capital. Certain provisions of the JOBS Act became effectively immediately upon passage on April 5, 2012, while other provisions require additional SEC rulemaking in order to take effect.

In this blogpost, we provide a brief update on the status of implementation of the JOBS Act and the remaining corporate governance and compliance provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Can I engage in general solicitation and advertising in connection with a private offering to accredited investors?

Not yet. Section 201(a) of the JOBS Act required the SEC, within 90 days of enactment of the JOBS Act, to revise the Rule 506 safe harbor from registration to allow general solicitation and general advertising for offers and sales of securities made under Rule 506, provided that all purchasers are accredited investors. The SEC was also required to revise Rule 144A, within 90 days of enactment of the JOBS Act, to provide that securities sold under Rule 144A may be offered to persons other than qualified institutional buyers (QIBs), including by means of general solicitation or advertising, provided that the securities are sold only to persons reasonably believed to be QIBs. The 90-day deadline expired on July 4, 2012, and the SEC has not yet adopted such revisions to Rule 506 or Rule 144A.

Chairman Shapiro noted in her testimony to Congress that the 90-day deadline did "not provide a realistic timeframe for the drafting of the new rule, the preparation of an accompanying economic analysis, the proper review by the Commission, and an opportunity for public input”. The SEC will consider rules to implement Section 201(a) on August 22, 2012. Typically, the SEC adopts proposed rules at the meeting at which they are considered.

What is the status of the crowdfunding provisions of the JOBS Act?

Title III of the JOBS Act provides a new exemption from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 for crowdfunding offerings. Crowdfunding involves the use of the internet and social media to raise capital, typically from a large number of people and in relatively small amounts per person. In May 2012, the SEC published responses to frequently asked questions related to the crowdfunding exemption which can be found here.

The JOBS Act requires the SEC to adopt crowdfunding rules within 270 days of enactment of the JOBS Act to implement the new crowdfunding exemption. Chairman Shapiro stated in her testimony to Congress that SEC staff in the Divisions of Corporations Finance and Trading and Markets are working closely together, along with the economists in the SEC's Division of Risk, Strategy, and Financial Innovation, to develop recommendations for the SEC. Chairman Shapiro did not indicate whether she expects the SEC to meet the 270-day deadline, which expires December 31, 2012.

What is the status of the JOBS Act IPO on-ramp provisions?

The IPO on-ramp provisions contained in Title I of the JOBS Act became effective immediately without SEC rulemaking. These provisions reduce regulatory burdens and disclosure requirements for qualifying “emerging growth companies” (EGCs). EGCs are companies with less than $1 billion in annual gross revenues and less than $700 million in publicly-traded shares that had their first registered sale of securities on or before December 8, 2011. For example, EGCs are allowed to “test the waters” by communicating with QIBS or institutional accredited investors prior to the sale of securities and they are allowed to submit their IPO registration statement on a confidential, non-public basis until closer to the time of the IPO "roadshow". In addition, EGCs may take advantage of scaled disclosure for both the IPO registration statement and subsequent filings required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for up to 5 years following the IPO.

The SEC has taken the following steps to enhance the implementation of Title I thus far:

  • outlined procedures guiding EGCs through the draft registration submission process
  • developed a secure e-mail process for confidential nonpublic submissions of IPO registration statements
  • issued frequently asked questions regarding Title I

Is relief from the “500-shareholder” rule available yet?

Yes. Title V and Title VI of the JOBS Act amended Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to raise the threshold for registration under the Exchange Act for companies and banks and bank holding companies from 500 securityholders of record to either 2,000 securityholders of record or 500 securityholders of record who are not accredited investors. Title V also excludes persons who received shares pursuant to employee compensatory plans in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act from counting against the number of holders of record. Shortly after enactment of the JOBS Act, the SEC posted guidance addressing expected questions related to Title V and Title VI. The JOBS Act requires the SEC to adopt safe harbor provisions that issuers can follow when determining whether holders of their securities received the securities pursuant to an employee compensation plan in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act. No deadline is given for these rules. The SEC’s posted guidance indicates that the required rulemaking does not affect the current availability of the JOBS Act amendments to Section 12(g). The SEC has not provided a target date for implementation of these regulations.

The JOBS Act also requires the SEC to report to Congress within 120 days after enactment on whether new enforcement tools are needed for the SEC to enforce the provisions of Rule 12g5-1 that disregard forms of holding securities that are used primarily to circumvent the registration provisions of Section 12(g). In her testimony to Congress, Chairman Shapiro stated that staff from the Division of Corporation Finance is working with staff from the Division of Risk, Strategy and Financial Information to review these provisions. Chairman Shapiro did not indicate whether she expects the SEC to meet the 120-day deadline, which expires August 3, 2012.

What disclosure rulemaking remains to be adopted under the Dodd-Frank Act? What is the timetable for adopting those rules? Is the required JOBS Act rulemaking taking priority of Dodd-Frank rule-making?

The SEC has yet to adopt the following disclosure rules required under the Dodd-Frank Act:  

Dodd-Frank Section

Description

Statutory Deadline

Status

953

Rules regarding disclosure of pay-for-performance and pay ratios

None

SEC actively working on it.  Acknowledges significant challenges given express requirements in statutory language. Prior projected timetable withdrawn.  Proposed bill in Congress to repeal Section 953.

 

954

Rules regarding recovery of executive compensation (clawbacks)

 

None

SEC actively working on it.  Prior projected timetable withdrawn.

955

Rules regarding disclosure of hedging by employees and directors

 

None

 

1502

Rules regarding disclosure related to "conflict minerals"

April 17, 2011

SEC proposed rules on December 15, 2010.  Conducted roundtable on October 18, 2011.  Commission to consider final rules on August 22, 2012.

 

1504

Rules regarding disclosure by resource extraction issuers

April 17, 2011

SEC proposed rules on December 15, 2010.  Commission to consider final rules on August 22, 2012.

At a talk given to the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals on July 14, 2012, Meredith Cross, Director of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance, stated that the SEC is working simultaneously on all of the required JOBS Act and Dodd-Frank Act required rules. She stated that the SEC did give priority to the Dodd-Frank provisions with statutory deadlines, but the SEC has not de-prioritized Dodd-Frank rulemaking without statutory deadlines in favor of the JOBS Act provisions with statutory deadlines. She did however indicate that capacity constraints must be expected to affect the speed at which any new rule-making can be completed.

What if you have questions?

For any questions or more information on these or any related matters, please contact any attorney in the firm’s corporate practice group. A list of such attorneys can be found by clicking Lawyers on this page.

John Tishler (858-720-8943, jtishler@sheppardmullin.com), Louis Lehot (650-815-2640, llehot@sheppardmullin.com), Edwin Astudillo (858-720-7468, eastudillo@sheppardmullin.com), Jason Schendel (650-815-2621, jschendel@sheppardmullin.com), and summer associate Irene Lu participated in drafting this posting.

Disclaimer

This update has been prepared by Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice, is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete and may or may not reflect the most current legal developments. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this update.

Source:
http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/capital-markets-update-on-timeline-for-sec-rulemaking-to-implement-the-jobs-act-and-doddfrank-act.html

law firms law office law offices lawer laws

Norfolk infringement verdict is $30M

A Norfolk federal jury has delivered a $30 million verdict in an advertising patent suit. The plaintiff – a small tech company holding a patent for online marketing techniques – had hoped for a bigger recovery in its suit against Internet giants including Google, but the verdict holds promise of far more in future damages.

The jury decided Google and other defendants should pay future royalties based on a percentage of advertising revenue until the patents expire in 2016. That could amount to hundreds of millions more, reports The Virginian-Pilot.

The patents for online advertising technology are owned by I/P Engine, a subsidiary of ring tone vendor Vringo. Vringo sued Google Inc., AOL Inc. and other Internet companies claiming they have been using the patented technology without permission. The suit sought at least $500 million for alleged infringement since 2005.

U.S. District Judge Raymond A. Jackson limited the damages to the period since the suit was filed, and the jury then applied a royalty rate to determine damages based on the companies’ annual revenues.

A post-verdict statement from Google said the company hopes to prevail in post-trial motions or on appeal.

The  case reflects the high stakes of recent patent litigation in Virginia, the Pilot reported. While a Northern Virginia inventor lost a multi-million-dollar patent infringement case against Twitter in the same courthouse last year, another small patent owner settled a claim against Verizon for more than $260 million.

The paper credits the Eastern District’s renowned “rocket docket” for attracting patent litigants.

Source: http://valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2012/11/07/norfolk-infringement-verdict-is-30m/

defense attorney

Metadata: What You Can’t See Can Hurt You!

Many are hearing about metadata in articles and blogs, but secretly admit that they don’t fully understand what it is. Digital Detectives co-hosts, Sharon D. Nelson, Esq., President of Sensei Enterprises, Inc. and John W. Simek, Vice President of Sensei Enterprises, join Karen Massand, the President of Litéra, to take a look at metadata, whether it takes an expert to find metadata in documents, leaking hidden data, and the new metadata problem caused by the "bring your own device movement".

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/digital-detectives/2012/09/metadata-what-you-cant-see-can-hurt-you/

criminal injury lawyers criminal justice lawyer criminal law criminal law cases criminal laws

Special Masters in E-Discovery

In this October edition of Digital Detectives, co-hosts Sharon D. Nelson, Esq., President of Sensei Enterprises, Inc. and John W. Simek, Vice President of Sensei Enterprises, join returning guest, attorney Craig Ball, to talk about special masters in e-discovery. Craig describes how an ESI special master gets involved in a case, what a special master does to fix broken discovery efforts and how to select an ESI special master.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/digital-detectives/2012/10/special-masters-in-e-discovery/

employment law

Evaluating and Negotiating Workers’ Compensation Claims

Closing a workers’ compensation claim involves a two-step process: evaluation and negotiation. On Ringler Radio, host Larry Cohen joins colleague, Teddy Snyder, Esq. and Attorney Sylvia Lopez from Bakersfield, California, to talk about closing workers’ compensation claims. They explore the risks and advantages to a claimant and employer in closing a workers’ compensation claim, the importance of rated age and how a structured settlement can give injured workers the best of both worlds.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ringler-radio/2012/05/evaluating-and-negotiating-workers-compensation-claims/

attorney attorney at law attorney definition attorney directory attorney fees

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Virginia amends constitution to restrict eminent domain

[JURIST] Virginia voters passed Question 1 [official voter pamphlet, PDF] on Tuesday by 76 percent [Virginia Board of Elections results], amending the state Constitution [materials] to include prohibitions on the State utilizing eminent domain [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST news archive] to seize private property. Question 1 amends Article 1, Section 11 [text] of the state Constitution to "require that eminent domain only be exercised where the property taken or damaged is for public use and, except for utilities or the...

Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/11/virginia-passes-restriction-on-eminent-domain.php

attorney definition

Tekken Tag Tournament 2 (PlayStation 3) (Albuquerque Journal)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Law - Video Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/law/video/260971491?client_source=feed&format=rss

law offices lawer laws lawyer lawyer colleges

How Law Firms Can Track Time

How does your firm track time? On The Un-Billable Hour, host Attorney Rodney Dowell, Executive Director at Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers and Director of LCL’s Massachusetts Law Office Management Assistance Program joins Danny Wen, Co-founder of Harvest Software and Sri Vemuri, Marketing Manager at Harvest Software, to discuss how law firms can track time and invoice clients in a way that captures more time and allows attorneys to receive payment more quickly.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/un-billable-hour/2012/02/how-law-firms-can-track-time/

legal help

Hiring Your First Employee

Hiring your first employee can feel like jumping off a cliff, but in some circumstances it can lead to more efficiency and profits. On The Un-Billable Hour, host Attorney Rodney Dowell, Executive Director at Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers and Director of LCL’s Massachusetts Law Office Management Assistance Program joins Lee Rosen, founder of the Rosen Law Firm, a North Carolina family law firm, blogger and practice management guru and Attorney Scott Stewart, from The Law Offices of Scott David Stewart out of Arizona, to talk about how to make the first hire a successful hire.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/un-billable-hour/2012/03/hiring-your-first-employee/

commercial law common law company law conservator copyright lawyer

XCOM: Enemy Unknown (PC) (Albuquerque Journal)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Law - Video News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/law/video/254812979?client_source=feed&format=rss

private attorney

Dickstein Shapiro Scores for Vringo in Google Patent Trial

A federal jury on Tuesday concluded that Google and four co-defendants infringe on Vringo's patents for a process of generating ads based on Internet search terms, awarding a combined $30 million in damages for past infringement. More importantly, the jury also found that Google should pay a running royalty to Vringo for future infringement until its patents expire in 2016.

Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.americanlawyer.com/digestTAL.jsp?id=1202577528291&rss=newswire

criminal defense attorneys criminal defense lawyer criminal injury lawyers criminal justice lawyer criminal law

Legal Issues Surrounding the Colorado Movie Massacre

The Aurora, Colorado movie theater massacre left 12 people dead and 58 wounded. The latest mass shooting in America brings up many legal issues on a national scale, including gun control, the insanity defense, liability and the death penalty. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, analyze the legal arguments of this case with Professor Adam Winkler from UCLA School of Law and Professor Daniel Filler from the Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/legal-issues-surrounding-the-colorado-movie-massacre/

laws

The Legal Crusade to Save Endangered Species

The world’s tiger population has declined by 97%. The African elephant population has been cut in half. 33% of open-ocean sharks are now threatened with extinction. These and other alarming statistics have created worldwide legal action to save the Earth’s endangered species. Lawyer2Lawyer co-host and attorney J. Craig Williams explores laws and initiatives designed to save threatened species with attorney and WildAid board member, David Kracke of Nichols and Associates in Portland, Oregon.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/the-legal-crusade-to-save-endangered-species/

defense attorney defense lawyer discrimination lawyers district attorney divorce atterney

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Tony Coelho: Fighting for the Disabled

On Ringler Radio, host Larry Cohen welcomes colleague Cindy Chanley, and returning guest, Tony Coelho, the past chair and member of the board of the American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD) and the interim President and CEO of the Epilepsy Foundation, to share his personal journey and his ongoing fight for people living with disabilities. Tony shares his thoughts on health care, how structured settlements have benefited a person with disabilities, in addition to the AAPD’s mission for 2012 and his work with the Epilepsy Foundation.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ringler-radio/2012/04/tony-coelho-fighting-for-the-disabled/

power of attorny

New York Appellate Court Adopts Delaware Supreme Court's Tooley Test For Determining Whether a Stockholder's Claim Is Direct or Derivative

In Yudell v. Gilbert, 2012 WL 3166788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep’t Aug. 7, 2012), the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, First Department, abandoned its prior ad hoc approach to determining whether a stockholder’s claim is “direct” (i.e., on behalf of the stockholder personally) or “derivative” (i.e., on behalf of the corporation as a whole), and held that the test applied by the Delaware Supreme Court in Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031 (Del. 2004), provides the appropriate analysis for resolving this inquiry. Under the Tooley test, the court must consider (i) who suffered the alleged harm (the corporation or the stockholder) and (ii) who would receive the benefit of any recovery or other remedy (the corporation or the stockholders individually). If the court determines that the corporation suffered the alleged harm and would receive the benefit of any remedy sought in the stockholder’s claim, then the claim must be brought derivatively, on behalf of the corporation, and is subject to the pre-suit demand requirement. Although the court’s decision appears to provide greater clarity to this often vexing issue under New York law, Delaware cases applying the test show that Tooley is far from the last word on the subject.

In Yudell, plaintiffs owned an interest in a joint venture partnership intended to construct and manage a shopping center. Dissatisfied with the perceived mismanagement of the shopping center, plaintiffs initiated a lawsuit against the manager of the shopping center and their partners in the joint venture purporting to allege both direct and derivative claims.

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for a failure to plead demand futility with the requisite specificity. In response, plaintiffs argued that although most of their claims were derivative, their third cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty was direct and thus not subject to the demand requirement. In this claim, plaintiffs alleged that the manager “failed to preserve [the entity’s] rights to collect unpaid tax obligations … and rent.”

The trial court disagreed, holding that all of plaintiffs’ causes of action were derivative in nature. For this reason, it dismissed the complaint after concluding that plaintiffs failed to plead either (i) that they made a pre-suit demand upon the board to pursue the claim on behalf of the entity or (ii) particularized facts indicating that pre-suit demand upon the board would have been futile. Plaintiffs appealed.

The Appellate Division affirmed. It began by recognizing that New York courts had not previously articulated a clear test for determining whether a claim is direct or derivative. Instead, New York jurisprudence approached the issue on a case-by-case basis depending upon the nature of the allegations. After discussing various circumstances where New York courts found that a stockholder’s claims are derivative (e.g., where the stockholder suffers solely through depreciation in the value of his or her stock, sues for mismanagement or alleges diversion of corporate assets or corporate opportunity), the Appellate Division adopted the Tooley test as consistent with New York law and applied it expressly to the facts of Yudell.

The Appellate Division observed that the manager’s alleged failure to collect the tax obligations and rent affected each of the joint venture members in proportion to their ownership interest in the entity. Moreover, in the event plaintiffs were successful with their lawsuit, the court recognized that any recovery would properly inure to the benefit of the corporation, not plaintiffs. Accordingly, the court held that plaintiffs’ claims were properly classified as derivative because the harms alleged in the complaint were suffered by the corporation.

By adopting the Delaware Supreme Court’s Tooley test, the court in Youdell appears to articulate a clearer test in New York for determining whether a claim is direct or derivative. Delaware cases applying Tooley, however, have recognized that applying this test can be difficult in practice. For example, in Feldman v. Cutaia, 951 A.2d 727 (Del. 2008), the Delaware Supreme Court rejected the stockholder plaintiffs’ argument that their claims against the company’s directors in connection with a cash-out merger were direct because the shareholders would have ultimately recovered the damages alleged. Instead, the Delaware Supreme Court concluded:

The mere fact that the alleged harm is ultimately suffered by, or the recovery would ultimately inure to the benefit of, the stockholders does not make a claim direct under Tooley. In order to state a direct claim, the plaintiff must have suffered some individualized harm not suffered by all of the stockholders at large.

Likewise, in In re NYMEX Shareholder Litigation, 2009 Del. Ch. LEXIS 176 (Del. Ch. Sept. 30, 2009), stockholders brought a class action alleging, inter alia, that the chairman of the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) breached his fiduciary duties by rejecting a proposed acquisition of NYMEX by the NYSE and favoring a merger with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange in order to secure a continued position with the exchange. Applying Tooley, the Delaware Court of Chancery explained, “the critical question is: ‘Looking at the body of the complaint and considering the nature of the wrong alleged and the relief requested, has the plaintiff demonstrated that he or she can prevail without showing an injury to the corporation.’”

In short, while Youdell certainly clarifies the law in New York, the question of whether a claim is direct or derivative is highly fact-intensive and can still be difficult to resolve.

For further information, please contact John Stigi* at (310) 228-3717 or Alejandro E. Moreno at (619) 338-6664.

* Admitted in New York and California.

Source:
http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/securities-litigation-new-york-appellate-court-adopts-delaware-supreme-courts-tooley-test-for-determining-whether-a-stockholders-claim-is-direct-or-derivative.html

personal injury attorneys personal injury lawyer personal injury lawyers power attorney power of attorney

Legal Talk Network Live at LegalTechNY 2012-Onit’s Eric Elman Spotlights Onit Apps

Eric Elfman spotlights "Onit Apps" for the legal marketplace which solve very specific problems for legal departments. Be sure to watch the interview, hosted by Legal Talk Network producer, Kate Kenney.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/special-reports/2012/02/legal-talk-network-live-at-legaltechny-2012-onits-eric-elman-spotlights-onit-apps/

employment lawyer san diego

New iPad, New Decisions

Apple just announced the newest version of the iPad, setting the Internet abuzz with anticipation and speculation. Is this next big thing? More importantly, must this be your next tech purchase? In this episode, Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell discuss the new iPad announcement and reactions, what the new iPad brings to the table, and whether lawyers should expect to see a new iPad in their possibly post-PC futures. After you listen, be sure to check out Tom & Dennis’ co-blog and book by the same name, The Lawyers Guide to Collaboration Tools and Technologies.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report/2012/03/new-ipad-new-decisions/

criminal laws criminal lawyer criminal lawyers cyber law defense attorney

Malawi enacts moratorium on anti-gay laws

[JURIST] A moratorium [Malawi Today report] has been enacted on Malawi's laws barring same-sex marriage and homosexuality, Malawi Minister of Justice Ralph Kasambara announced on Monday. According to him, the laws were suspended [Reuters report] to enable to the country consider permanently nullifying them. Section 153 and 156 [ILGA backgrounder, PDF] of Malawi's Penal Code stipulate 14 years or 5 years imprisonment, respectively, for anyone engaging in male homosexual activity or relationships. This year the law prompted the international community...

Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/11/malawi-enacts-moratorium-on-anti-gay-laws.php

pro bono lawyers

Now that Judge Lippman Has Taken Charge

When New York Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman decided that it was time to assert his rule-making authority by instituting a 50 hour pro bono requirement of applicants to admission to practice, he opened a door.  Jeffrey Kurzon has decided to go through that door.

Via Above the Law, Kurzon has sent Judge Lippman a letter asking that he use his authority as chief judge to make a difference.

In the past few years, there has been a wide public debate about the number of lawyers practicing law throughout the country. Our concern is not with the quality of education, but rather the quantity of lawyers being produced each year who graduate with hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt at the expense of tax payers - and then have no way to pay such nonbankruptcy dischargeable debt back by practicing as lawyers.

While it is true that legal access for the poor is a concern, what is troubling is that recent law school graduates are graduating without jobs and with hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt. And so enticed by the dream of becoming a lawyer, what happens is that they become worse than poor; they become enslaved to a lifetime of debt.

Kurzon points to Thomas M. Cooley Law School as the poster boy of all that's gone wrong under the control of the American Bar Association.

And thus the question is asked: when is enough enough?

Would the American Medical Association permit half of its recent graduates to graduate with no job or no way to payoff their loans?

Essentially, there is a systemic failure in the legal academy and we write this letter to ask that the Court establish a special task force to review the authority it has delegated to the ABA and make specific recommendations and force their enactment on the ABA on how to improve the legal education system in our country.

Think of the tag line, "Think Globally. Act Locally."  We've grown inured to the control of the ABA, their requirements for accreditation and their choice as to how many law schools should be out there, raking in tuition, providing homes for scholars, cranking out young men and women who expect to practice law, or at least have a secure financial future as a lawyer.  Brian Tamanaha, in his book, Failing Law Schools, offered the backstory of how the ABA came into power over law schools.  There was nothing magical about it.

That a problem exists isn't in dispute, at least not among anyone to be taken seriously and who doesn't have a huge paycheck in the race.  But while there are well-meaning folks trying to find a global solution, we can't even get the stakeholders in the same room, no less engaged in any kind of meaningful discussion. 

Some, like the lawprofs, are holding symposiums amongst themselves. Others, like practitioners, are too busy scratching for their own business to be bothered.  And still others, like me, aren't welcome in the talks because we neither represent Biglaw nor the Legal Academy, and those are the only players who matter.

By sending this letter to Judge Lippman, Jeffrey Kurzon has taken a new direction that has a great deal of merit.  If we can't come up with a global solution, and the ABA, an insular community of lawyers who are deeply concerned with their own importance as Leaders of the Bar and protectors of the status quo, won't deal with it during the timeframe of a life in being, then what's left for the tens of thousand (yes, tens of thousands) of new lawyers being cranked out of law school with nowhere to go?  

Like Kurzon, I have no doubt that part of the solution lies in part with the closure of law schools.  Despite the progressive dream that more lawyers means lower cost legal services and greater availability to the poor and working classes, the numbers do not crunch.  They never had. They never will. It's a flawed dream, and no theoretical band-aids are going to change it.

Lawyers need to earn enough money to pay for law school, to cover their lost opportunity costs, and to feed their families. Lawyers, no matter how deeply they feel the responsibility of their position, still need to eat, put a roof over their heads and occasionally drive a car. They can't do this on the adoring appreciation of their clients alone.  And most have no interest in trying.

So if the ABA refuses to fix the problem they created, and continue to perpetuate, the big fix will remain out of reach.  Why, then, not shoot for the smaller fix? 

As Judge Lippman has taken the lead with the pro bono requirement for admission to practice, so too can he take the lead in putting an end to the ABA's tyranny. He has the rule-making authority for admission, and is under no obligation to continue to recognize the ABA's acceditation of law schools as being anything more than one voluntary association's view of lawyer-life.  They won't deal with the mess? Screw 'em. They aren't the center of the legal universe, even though they think they are and we've let them be. 

Each year, more law students flip their tassels. Put aside their worthiness to be lawyers, as some will be great ones and others will suck, and we can't tell who is who yet.  What we can tell is that many are walking away from law school to life as a slave to debt and a future of misery. We know this, and yet we allow it to happen.  Judge Lippman doesn't have to let this happen in New York on his watch.

Jeffrey Kurzon is right, and if Judge Lippman forms a task force, I will volunteer to be on it.  I only hope it reports back before another ten fifty thousand souls are buried in misery, but I will do my best to help Kurzon, and Judge Lippman, to see that doesn't happen.




 



© 2012 Simple Justice NY LLC. This feed is for personal, non-commercial & Newstex use only. The use of this feed on any other website is a copyright violation. If this feed is not via RSS reader or Newstex, it infringes the copyright.

Source: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2012/10/24/now-that-judge-lippman-has-taken-charge.aspx?ref=rss

criminal defense attorney criminal defense attorneys criminal defense lawyer criminal injury lawyers criminal justice lawyer

Advanced Searching and Technology Assisted Review

Identify the best practices for conducting smart searches by listening to The ESI Report. Host and Attorney and Director of Thought Leadership at Kroll Ontrack, Michele Lange, gets expert advice for conducting smart searches and exploring advanced search options to increase the effectiveness of your search protocol from Harris T. Berenson, E-discovery Counsel for Hughes Hubbard & Reed and Alex C. Gross, Legal Consultant at Kroll Ontrack. Then on the Bits & Bytes Legal Analysis segment, Kroll Ontrack Legal Consultant, Mark Thompson, analyzes recent court opinions discussing the hot topic of technology assisted review.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/esi-report/2012/05/advanced-searching-and-technology-assisted-review/

laws

Recommendations for a Social, Mobile and Global Legal Profession

The ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 has released its latest recommendations so that the rules and ethics of the legal profession keep up with the incredible pace of technology. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, get the details from the ABA Commission’s Chief Reporter, Professor Andrew Perlman, and debate these suggestions with Attorney Bradley Shear.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/06/recommendations-for-a-social-mobile-and-global-legal-profession/

government lawyer green card lawyer immigration attorney immigration law immigration lawyer

Monday, November 5, 2012

Suffolk and the BITAHR Film Festival

Dean Seidman, a member of Suffolk Law's faculty and an Associate Dean, discusses the law school's support of the Boston Initiative to Advance Human Rights and its 2012 Film Festival. Learn more at bitahr.org and bitahrfilmforum.org.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2012/02/suffolk-and-the-bitahr-film-festival/

power of attorny

Why Go with a Structured Settlement?

After an individual suffers a severe injury and a settlement is reached, he or she is left with the option of either taking a lump sum of cash, or a structured settlement. Today on Ringler Radio, Larry Cohen joins co-host and colleague, Keith Christie, to get a lawyer's perspective from Attorney Trey Haik from the law firm of Haik, Minvielle & Grubbs, on the benefits of the structured settlement and how a structure can financially support clients and their families for years to come.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ringler-radio/2012/08/why-go-with-a-structured-settlement/

immigration law immigration lawyer immigration lawyers injury attorney injury attorneys

Gone Clio with Attorney Andrew Legrand

On Gone Clio, Clio co-founder Jack Newton talks with special guest, New Orleans lawyer, Andrew Legrand. Andrew discusses his method for being completely paperless, disaster recovery and cloud storage, Clio’s Maildrop feature and shares his thoughts on the online law practice model.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/gone-clio/2012/06/gone-clio-with-attorney-andrew-legrand/

discrimination lawyers

Language is Everything

For growth and expansion, there are two philosophies:

               Trail your growth (conservative), or

               Hire for the future (confident and assertive)

For troubled times, there are two philosophies:

               Slow to hire

               Quick to fire

 Lawyers should do only two things:

               Market for new business:

                              Only they know if they want to represent the prospect

                              Only they know if they’re competent to handle the matter

               Lawyering

                              Only the lawyer is licensed by the state to practice

All else can and should be handled by others

Source: http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/LawBizBlog/~3/_hIdKCRnitA/

legal information legal news legal services lemon law letter of attorney

Judge Gray Miller of the Southern District of Texas

Judge Gray Miller of the Southern District of Texas shares tips for trying cases in his courtroom with senior reporter Brenda Sapino Jeffreys.

Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/tx/PubArticleTX.jsp?id=1202576289915&rss=newswire

employment attorney

In EU’s Top Court, Silence Is Golden

European Pressphoto Agency
The logo of the European Court of Justice
Imagine the Supreme Court without oral arguments. Cases would move faster and probably be cheaper for clients. Larger-than-life advocates like John Roberts Jr. (before he ascended to the Supreme Court) and Paul Clement would be reduced to a signature at the end of a brief. Whether justice confined to paper is better than our current system is a question you can debate in the comments section. But in the European Union's top court, this line of inquiry is more than hypothetical. Under rules that took force Wednesday in the European Court of Justice, the burden is now on the parties to request oral arguments and show why they are necessary. . .

Source: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/11/01/in-eus-top-court-silence-is-golden/?mod=WSJBlog

family lawyer federal attorney financial lawyer find a lawyer find an attorney

Suspension, Not Disbarment, Urged For Hiding Client Funds, Using Them

A lawyer who shielded a client's assets from the other spouse in a divorce proceeding and then used them himself should be suspended for three years but not disbarred, New Jersey's Disciplinary Review Board has recommended. The board saw the lawyer's relationship with the client as an illegitimate enterprise, not a lawyer-client bond. For more stories on lawyers and judges in trouble, see "The Hot Seat," our roundup of ALM coverage.

Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/nj/PubArticleNJ.jsp?id=1202577039484&rss=newswire

injury lawyers

Court proposes to drop full-time rule for waived-in lawyers

Following angry reactions prompted by examination of the rules for “waived in” lawyers, the Supreme Court of Virginia is proposing to drop its full-time practice requirement.

The change would affect lawyers who were licensed in other states and then admitted to the bar in Virginia by reciprocity, without taking the Virginia bar exam. Many of those lawyers, said to be “admitted by motion,” chafed at a rule under which their bar admission could be revoked if they failed to “practice full time as a member of the Virginia State Bar.” Regulations specified at least 35 hours a week.

Under proposed rules published for comment this week, the permanent full-time practice requirement would be replaced by a requirement for five years of practice “predominantly” in Virginia. The amended rules apparently would dispense with any minimum number of hours for a law practice.

“Predominantly” would mean that a lawyer’s Virginia practice each year would equal or exceed any practice in other jurisdictions.

Current regulations prohibit a waived-in lawyer from dividing time between a Virginia office and one in another jurisdiction.

Until the five-year requirement is met, a waived-in lawyer would have to certify annually that he or she is practicing predominantly in the commonwealth. If the lawyer elected not to continue with a predominant Virginia practice, the lawyer could opt for associate status.

Lawyers admitted on motion complained last year that the full-time practice requirement unfairly hindered attorneys taking time off for child birth or child care, older lawyers seeking to limit their work hours and retired lawyers who wanted to offer pro bono services.

Source: http://valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2012/10/22/court-proposes-to-drop-full-time-rule-for-waived-in-lawyers/

dwi lawyer electronic power of attorney employment attorney employment law employment law courses

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Suffolk Law's Pro Bono Program

Mia Friedman, Director of Public Interest and Pro Bono Programs at Suffolk Law's Rappaport Center for Law and Public Service, reviews our Pro Bono Program. Learn more at rappaportcenter.org.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/suffolk-law/2012/08/suffolk-laws-pro-bono-program/

law offices

Digital estate plan

I’ve talked about a lawyer having an estate plan. I’ve talked about creating an estate plan for your law practice; this is an idea first generated by Ellen Peck, retired judge of the California State Bar Trial Court. Now, there is another estate plan to prepare: Digital.

What are you going to do with all your passwords, all your email accounts, all your accounts in social media and all your other accounts that reside in the internet?   

Your virtual life doesn’t end just because you die. And in some arenas, the material you have on the internet cannot be removed or taken down. You may even have money residing in some of the internet residences such as PayPal, on-line gambling accounts, etc. Be sure to appoint or designate someone to be responsible for dealing with these issues. Be sure to write down all the accounts and passwords. And be sure to contact such companies as LinkedIn, Facebook, Google, etc. to comply with their policies.       

There is little or no case law to date about planning for digital assets after death, and certainly no precedent of which I’m aware on this. But, for just that reason, it’s time to think about these issues.

Source: http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/LawBizBlog/~3/QDgT94Eqj7A/

criminal attorney criminal defence lawyer criminal defense criminal defense attorney criminal defense attorneys

Kuwait arrests opposition leader for negative comments against regime

[JURIST] Opposition leader and former MP Mussallam Al Barrak [Gulf News backgrounder] was arrested on Tuesday after criticizing leader Emir Shaikh Sabah Al Ahmad Al Sabah, which is a crime under Kuwait's constitution. Barrak was arrested [Gulf News Report] after a public speech on October 15 was found to contain remarks detrimental to the "social and political balance of the country." His remarks broke the silence surrounding criticisms of the regime that has lasted for decades. The rally was in...

Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/10/kuwait-arrests-opposition-leader-for-negative-comments-against-regime.php

immigration lawyers

From the Courtroom to the Comedy Club

Lawyers are very often the brunt of jokes, but there is a group of attorneys that has turned the tables and is making people laugh with them instead of at them. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, share the stage with two of the Comedians At Law. Alex Barnett and Matt Ritter explain how they transitioned from lawyers to comics and how they now make people laugh at the lighter side of the law.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/08/from-the-courtroom-to-the-comedy-club/

lawer laws lawyer lawyer colleges lawyer directory

Liability in the Costa Concordia Cruise Ship Tragedy

The capsizing of the luxury cruise ship, Costa Concordia, off the coast of Italy has created a torrent of possible criminal charges against the captain and civil litigation against the cruise line company in courtrooms around the world. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, along with Attorney Joseph McFaul, special counsel for Sedgwick LLP in Irvine, California, sort through the plethora of legal issues associated with this cruise ship tragedy.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/liability-in-the-costa-concordia-cruise-ship-tragedy/

real estate attorney

The 2011 Year in Review & Legal Predictions for 2012

From the spectacle of the Casey Anthony trial, to the great debate over the health care law, to the controversial immigration law in Arizona, 2011 was a big year in the law. Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, J. Craig Williams and Robert Ambrogi welcome returning guest, Stephen L. Kaplan from the firm Hicks, Mims, Kaplan & Burns, to review his 2011 predictions and look ahead to a brand new year, 2012!

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/01/the-2011-year-in-review-legal-predictions-for-2012/

attorneys bankruptcy attorney bankruptcy lawyer bankruptcy lawyers best attorney

Lawyer2Lawyer: A Retrospective

We started Lawyer2Lawyer back in August of 2005 with the idea of providing quality content and discussion of timely legal news and information for the legal profession with regularly published podcasts and often videos too. Since our inception, we have set the precedent for legal podcasting in numbers of listeners globally, but more importantly, we’ve been one of the leaders in great content - our priority over the past 7 years. On this final edition of Lawyer2Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, talk about their personal experiences over the years with this legal podcast.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/10/lawyer2lawyer-a-retrospective/

corporate law

Structured Settlements and NSSTA’s 2012 Mission

NSSTA stands for National Structured Settlements Trade Association - the largest gathering of top professionals in the country taking the a lead in the structured settlement industry. On Ringler Radio, host Larry Cohen welcomes Eric Vaughn, Executive Director of National Structured Settlements Trade Association, to discuss what’s ahead for NSSTA 2012. Eric addresses everything from NSSTA’s Annual Meeting to its Take the Hill initiative with Congress, and the steps individuals of retirement age should take to ensure a better financial future.

Click the link to see a video snippet of the podcast.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ringler-radio/2012/03/structured-settlements-and-nsstas-2012-mission/

employment lawyer san diego employment lawyers estate attorney family law family lawyer

Saturday, November 3, 2012

I’ll Tumblr for Ya

While Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter draw the lion’s share of social media attention, there are many other social media platforms available to lawyers. Tumblr, Pinterest and Foursquare are just a few of the alternatives. How can you evaluate which of these tools might be worthy of your time and effort? On The Kennedy-Mighell Report, Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell survey the lesser-traveled landscapes of the social media world, identify some tools that might make sense to some lawyers in some scenarios, and speculate about the future of specialized social media tools.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report/2012/07/ill-tumblr-for-ya/

legal aid society

What Should Solos Be Charging?

Are you confused about what to charge your clients? New Solo host and solo practitioner, Attorney Kyle R. Guelcher talks to Attorney Jeremy Byellin, from Byellin Law, PLLC, about how a solo can determine how much to charge, the Laffey Matrix, the pros and cons of charging flat rates to clients and offers advice on how to communicate fees during the initial client meeting.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/new-solo/2012/07/what-should-solos-be-charging/

solicitor solicitors statute law statutory law stupid laws

Obamacare on Trial

The fate of President Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is now in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. But did lawyers for the Obama Administration convince the justices this historic healthcare initiative conforms to the U.S. Constitution? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams, along with Professor Ilya Somin from the George Mason University School of Law and Professor Geoffrey Stone of The Law School of the University of Chicago, discuss the constitutionality and possible outcomes of this landmark Supreme Court case.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/04/obamacare-on-trial/

employment lawyer

Supreme Court hears arguments in Sixth, Fourth Amendment cases

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] in two cases Thursday. In Chaidez v. United States [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court heard arguments to determine if Padilla v. Kentucky [JURIST report] applies retroactively to persons whose convictions became final before its announcement. Padilla held that the Sixth Amendment [text] guarantee of effective assistance of counsel requires a criminal defense lawyer to advise a non-citizen client that pleading guilty to an aggravated felony will...

Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/11/supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-sixth-fourth-amendment-cases.php

law firms law office law offices lawer laws

Constitutionality of Prop 8 and the Future of Gay Marriage

Just this month, after a long three year legal battle, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California’s Proposition 8, which is the ballot measure that banned gay marriage, is unconstitutional. The question remains-will this case now head to the U.S. Supreme Court? Lawyer2Lawyer co-hosts and attorneys, Bob Ambrogi and J. Craig Williams, join Jennifer C. Pizer, Legal Director at the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law and Vikram David Amar, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law, to take a look at this ruling and what this means for the future of gay marriage in America.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/lawyer-2-lawyer/2012/02/constitutionality-of-prop-8-and-the-future-of-gay-marriage/

patent lawyer

Dayton appoints 2 judges

Michelle Winkis Lawson Appointed to Seventh Judicial District Court, Christina Wietzema Appointed to Fifth Judicial District Court

Gov. Mark Dayton announced the appointments of Michelle Winkis Lawson and Christina Wietzema as District Court Judges in Minnesota’s Seventh and Fifth Judicial Districts.

Lawson will replace the Honorable Michael L. Kirk who was appointed earlier this year to the Minnesota Court of Appeals. Wietzema will replace the Honorable Bruce F. Gross who retired earlier this year. Lawson’s seat will be chambered in Moorhead in Clay County in Minnesota’s Seventh Judicial District, while Wietzema’s seat will be co-chambered in Cottonwood and Murray Counties in the Fifth Judicial District.

Lawson serves as the Chief Assistant Clay County Attorney for the Civil Division, and has served as the Interim Clay County Attorney. Prior to this, she worked as a facilitator for the University of Mary and was an associate attorney with the Vogel Law Firm. Lawson is a member of the Clay County Children’s Justice Initiative.

Wietzema currently works as an Assistant Public Defender for the Fifth Judicial District where she represents indigent clients in all areas of public defense. Prior to this, she represented clients in family law, real property and criminal law as an associate attorney with Bernardy & Scholl. Wietzema is a member of the Rock Nobles Community Corrections Advisory Board and is a volunteer mock trial judge.

Minnesota’s Seventh Judicial District consists of Becker, Benton, Clay, Douglas, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Otter Tail, Stearns, Todd and Wadena Counties and the Fifth Judicial Districts consists of Blue Earth, Brown, Cottonwood, Faribault, Jackson, Lincoln, Lyon, Martin, Murray, Nicollet, Nobles, Pipestone, Redwood, Rock and Watonwan Counties.

 

Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2012/10/23/dayton-appoints-2-judges/

defense lawyer discrimination lawyers district attorney divorce atterney divorce attorney

Demystifying Technology Assisted Review; Taxation of Costs in Race Tires

Amidst growing data volumes and dwindling resources, traditional linear document review is quickly going the way of the dinosaur. On The ESI Report, host Michele Lange, Attorney and Director of Thought Leadership at Kroll Ontrack welcomes special guest, David D. Lewis, Ph.D., President of David D. Lewis Consulting and co-founder of TREC Legal Track and Kara M. Kirkeby, Esq., Manager of Document Review Services at Kroll Ontrack, Inc., to explore the exciting new developments in technology-assisted review, and how these developments are rapidly impacting the world of e-discovery. On the Bits & Bytes Legal Analysis segment, Kroll Ontrack legal correspondent, Alicia J. Smith, analyzes the March 16th 2012 appellate court decision in Race Tires America v. Hoosier Racing Tire.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/esi-report/2012/04/demystifying-technology-assisted-review-taxation-of-costs-in-race-tires/

law firm

Mark Woods: The buck finally stops on Steve Wallace's desk -- 1.2 million of them (Florida Times-Union)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Law - Video Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/law/video/254442972?client_source=feed&format=rss

immigration attorney immigration law immigration lawyer immigration lawyers injury attorney

Friday, November 2, 2012

Tool designed to help students choose the right law school for them

Prospective law students have a new resource for researching schools. Law School Transparency has launched a "Score Reports" tool on its website that provides users with an apples-to-apples comparison between schools on employment outcomes, admissions standards and costs.

Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202576973599&rss=rss_nlj

bankruptcy attorney

WHO REPRESENTS CORPORATE AMERICA

For this year's survey of the law firms who represent America's largest corporations, we've chosen to highlight one example of the longer-term relationships between in-house counsel and the law firms that represent them.

Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202518045792&rss=rss_nlj

colorado disability lawyer commercial law common law company law conservator

What Should Solos Be Charging?

Are you confused about what to charge your clients? New Solo host and solo practitioner, Attorney Kyle R. Guelcher talks to Attorney Jeremy Byellin, from Byellin Law, PLLC, about how a solo can determine how much to charge, the Laffey Matrix, the pros and cons of charging flat rates to clients and offers advice on how to communicate fees during the initial client meeting.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/new-solo/2012/07/what-should-solos-be-charging/

attorney finder

J&J Shareholders' Suit Settles; $10M in Fees, Costs Expected

Johnson & Johnson has agreed to ramp up oversight of subsidiaries and to pay up to $10.5 million in attorney fees and costs to settle a shareholder fraud and misconduct suit. Only a few shareholders have objected to the proposed settlement, with most objections focusing on the fees and costs requested by six plaintiff firms.

Source: http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/nj/PubArticleNJ.jsp?id=1202576881817&rss=newswire

estate attorney family law family lawyer federal attorney financial lawyer

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Hey, Junior. There's This Really Cool Place Called "Outside."

forest%20trees%20tree.jpg

The world is so vast and full of excitement and wonder. Why would you not want to explore it? Well, in a word, xBox. As reported by The Review (East Liverpool, Ohio):

A deputy was called to a home on Wayne Bridge Road, Lisbon, at 9:10 a.m. Sunday, because a 17-year-old boy became unruly after his aunt and uncle took away his xBox system. The boy was told he needed to mind his aunt and uncle, and he agreed there would be no further problem.
Hey kid, take a hike.

Source: http://rss.justia.com/~r/LegalJuiceCom/~3/qHLBtC28TcA/post_520.html

divorce lawyers

Now that Judge Lippman Has Taken Charge

When New York Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman decided that it was time to assert his rule-making authority by instituting a 50 hour pro bono requirement of applicants to admission to practice, he opened a door.  Jeffrey Kurzon has decided to go through that door.

Via Above the Law, Kurzon has sent Judge Lippman a letter asking that he use his authority as chief judge to make a difference.

In the past few years, there has been a wide public debate about the number of lawyers practicing law throughout the country. Our concern is not with the quality of education, but rather the quantity of lawyers being produced each year who graduate with hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt at the expense of tax payers - and then have no way to pay such nonbankruptcy dischargeable debt back by practicing as lawyers.

While it is true that legal access for the poor is a concern, what is troubling is that recent law school graduates are graduating without jobs and with hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt. And so enticed by the dream of becoming a lawyer, what happens is that they become worse than poor; they become enslaved to a lifetime of debt.

Kurzon points to Thomas M. Cooley Law School as the poster boy of all that's gone wrong under the control of the American Bar Association.

And thus the question is asked: when is enough enough?

Would the American Medical Association permit half of its recent graduates to graduate with no job or no way to payoff their loans?

Essentially, there is a systemic failure in the legal academy and we write this letter to ask that the Court establish a special task force to review the authority it has delegated to the ABA and make specific recommendations and force their enactment on the ABA on how to improve the legal education system in our country.

Think of the tag line, "Think Globally. Act Locally."  We've grown inured to the control of the ABA, their requirements for accreditation and their choice as to how many law schools should be out there, raking in tuition, providing homes for scholars, cranking out young men and women who expect to practice law, or at least have a secure financial future as a lawyer.  Brian Tamanaha, in his book, Failing Law Schools, offered the backstory of how the ABA came into power over law schools.  There was nothing magical about it.

That a problem exists isn't in dispute, at least not among anyone to be taken seriously and who doesn't have a huge paycheck in the race.  But while there are well-meaning folks trying to find a global solution, we can't even get the stakeholders in the same room, no less engaged in any kind of meaningful discussion. 

Some, like the lawprofs, are holding symposiums amongst themselves. Others, like practitioners, are too busy scratching for their own business to be bothered.  And still others, like me, aren't welcome in the talks because we neither represent Biglaw nor the Legal Academy, and those are the only players who matter.

By sending this letter to Judge Lippman, Jeffrey Kurzon has taken a new direction that has a great deal of merit.  If we can't come up with a global solution, and the ABA, an insular community of lawyers who are deeply concerned with their own importance as Leaders of the Bar and protectors of the status quo, won't deal with it during the timeframe of a life in being, then what's left for the tens of thousand (yes, tens of thousands) of new lawyers being cranked out of law school with nowhere to go?  

Like Kurzon, I have no doubt that part of the solution lies in part with the closure of law schools.  Despite the progressive dream that more lawyers means lower cost legal services and greater availability to the poor and working classes, the numbers do not crunch.  They never had. They never will. It's a flawed dream, and no theoretical band-aids are going to change it.

Lawyers need to earn enough money to pay for law school, to cover their lost opportunity costs, and to feed their families. Lawyers, no matter how deeply they feel the responsibility of their position, still need to eat, put a roof over their heads and occasionally drive a car. They can't do this on the adoring appreciation of their clients alone.  And most have no interest in trying.

So if the ABA refuses to fix the problem they created, and continue to perpetuate, the big fix will remain out of reach.  Why, then, not shoot for the smaller fix? 

As Judge Lippman has taken the lead with the pro bono requirement for admission to practice, so too can he take the lead in putting an end to the ABA's tyranny. He has the rule-making authority for admission, and is under no obligation to continue to recognize the ABA's acceditation of law schools as being anything more than one voluntary association's view of lawyer-life.  They won't deal with the mess? Screw 'em. They aren't the center of the legal universe, even though they think they are and we've let them be. 

Each year, more law students flip their tassels. Put aside their worthiness to be lawyers, as some will be great ones and others will suck, and we can't tell who is who yet.  What we can tell is that many are walking away from law school to life as a slave to debt and a future of misery. We know this, and yet we allow it to happen.  Judge Lippman doesn't have to let this happen in New York on his watch.

Jeffrey Kurzon is right, and if Judge Lippman forms a task force, I will volunteer to be on it.  I only hope it reports back before another ten fifty thousand souls are buried in misery, but I will do my best to help Kurzon, and Judge Lippman, to see that doesn't happen.




 



© 2012 Simple Justice NY LLC. This feed is for personal, non-commercial & Newstex use only. The use of this feed on any other website is a copyright violation. If this feed is not via RSS reader or Newstex, it infringes the copyright.

Source: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2012/10/24/now-that-judge-lippman-has-taken-charge.aspx?ref=rss

stupid laws traffic attorney traffic lawyer traffic ticket lawyer absolute power of attorney

The USLAW Network: Benefitting Clients

Many of the cases structured settlement brokers handle are very complex. Clients in these situations need great legal counsel to represent them in the courtroom and beyond. On this edition of Ringler Radio, host Larry Cohen welcomes colleague, Tony Robinson and guest, Attorney Sheryl Willert, the managing director of Williams Kastner and Chair of the USLAW Network Board of Directors. Sheryl explains the USLAW Network’s mission and how clients can access some of the best trial lawyers in the country and around the world, while also receiving cost-effective representation.

Source: http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/ringler-radio/2012/01/the-uslaw-network-benefitting-clients/

attorney lawyer

Dayton appoints 2 judges

Michelle Winkis Lawson Appointed to Seventh Judicial District Court, Christina Wietzema Appointed to Fifth Judicial District Court

Gov. Mark Dayton announced the appointments of Michelle Winkis Lawson and Christina Wietzema as District Court Judges in Minnesota’s Seventh and Fifth Judicial Districts.

Lawson will replace the Honorable Michael L. Kirk who was appointed earlier this year to the Minnesota Court of Appeals. Wietzema will replace the Honorable Bruce F. Gross who retired earlier this year. Lawson’s seat will be chambered in Moorhead in Clay County in Minnesota’s Seventh Judicial District, while Wietzema’s seat will be co-chambered in Cottonwood and Murray Counties in the Fifth Judicial District.

Lawson serves as the Chief Assistant Clay County Attorney for the Civil Division, and has served as the Interim Clay County Attorney. Prior to this, she worked as a facilitator for the University of Mary and was an associate attorney with the Vogel Law Firm. Lawson is a member of the Clay County Children’s Justice Initiative.

Wietzema currently works as an Assistant Public Defender for the Fifth Judicial District where she represents indigent clients in all areas of public defense. Prior to this, she represented clients in family law, real property and criminal law as an associate attorney with Bernardy & Scholl. Wietzema is a member of the Rock Nobles Community Corrections Advisory Board and is a volunteer mock trial judge.

Minnesota’s Seventh Judicial District consists of Becker, Benton, Clay, Douglas, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Otter Tail, Stearns, Todd and Wadena Counties and the Fifth Judicial Districts consists of Blue Earth, Brown, Cottonwood, Faribault, Jackson, Lincoln, Lyon, Martin, Murray, Nicollet, Nobles, Pipestone, Redwood, Rock and Watonwan Counties.

 

Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2012/10/23/dayton-appoints-2-judges/

real estate lawyer solicitor solicitors statute law statutory law